“The first crime of the new reign was the murder of Postumus Agrippa. Though he was surprised and unarmed, a centurion of the firmest resolution despatched [sic] him with difficulty. Tiberius gave no explanation of the matter to the Senate; he pretended that there were directions from his father ordering the tribune in charge of the prisoner not to delay the slaughter of Agrippa, whenever he should himself have breathed his last…It was more probable that Tiberius and Livia, the one from fear, the other from a stepmother’s enmity, hurried on the destruction of a youth whom they suspected and hated” (Tactius, Annals, Book 1)
Tacitus is trying so hard to blame Livia for everything, however, it seems far more reasonable to believe Tiberius murdered Postumus to test his new power. His mother, Livia, even if she was ‘evil’ wouldn’t have any reason to kill Postumus. Tiberius was already in power and Livia wouldn’t want to upset the citizens by killing someone who already seemed to be a matter of controversy. The empire is already in a precarious state and Livia most likely would not want to cause any major disruptions.
It’s clear Tiberius just wanted to test his power and kill someone off; not only to do this, but to see how the people responded. Posthumus was the best choice as a statement as he was out of the political picture; so it would not seem as if Tiberius was any ‘true’ threat to the politicians in Rome as his vicinity was far out of reach. An exile. However it was clear that Tiberius was testing the citizens, and it is best to assume that if the people did revolt, Tiberius would have no trouble quieting them as he did not seem to take threats to his power lightly.
Commentary © Author of thetwelvecaesars.com